Snake Cult / Myth lab Study 001

Where do myth
trees begin?

A tree connects stories. Its root proposes a beginning. Change the assumptions. See what survives.

Enter the experiment
ROOT EXPLORERFOUR CASES / ONE QUESTION

Loading the research trees…

The interpretation

A better fit.
A harder question.

Moving a root changes which branches appear early. It does not change who is connected to whom. Under a stationary, reversible model, those different beginnings have the same likelihood.

Here, a directional model allows the distribution of traits at the root to differ from the long-run distribution. That gives the data a way to prefer a beginning. The result depends on that assumption—and on which traits were recorded.

The best-fitting sampled branch is a model result. It is not a date, an ancient population, or a demonstrated birthplace.

Open the research notes

What the controls change

Each fitted comparison holds the connections in the tree fixed, then refits the root and model parameters. Fit differences compare roots within the selected model and matrix. They are not probabilities that a culture invented a story.

Where available, the trait-selection controls ask whether the conclusion changes when accounting for how motifs entered the matrix. A changed winner is a useful result: it shows which assumption carries the inference.

Method background: Felsenstein on reversible models and rooting; Lewis on correcting for character selection.

What the rows mean

The dragon and men–women matrices pool traits by region. Cosmic Hunt and Cinderella contain versions of a recognisable story. Neither kind of row is an ancient ancestor. Cultural borrowing and incomplete sampling can also make a tree an imperfect description.

Sources for the selected study

Source references are included in the downloadable dataset.

Download the explorer data

Read the argument about African roots