TL;DR
- Older comparativists link the Great Mother to sacralized sexuality via three conveyors: (i) hieros gamos (sacred marriage) and fertility blessing, (ii) consecrated personnel (terms like hierodoulos, qadištu, hetaira), and (iii) votive/temple economy oriented to love/fruitfulness Harrison 1903, Frazer 1907/1911, Robertson Smith 1889.
- Core ancient passages: Herodotus on Babylon (“every woman … once”), Strabo on Corinth (“more than a thousand hierodouloi”), and Lucian on Hierapolis (Atargatis) with erotic/chthonic rites—paired with Sumerian love‑songs of Inanna–Dumuzi for the royal sacred marriage frame Herodotus 1.199, Strabo 8.6.20, Lucian, De Dea Syria, ETCSL index.
- The linkage is myth‑ritual‑economy: the Mother’s cosmic fecundity grounds rites where eros mediates prosperity, kingship, and seasonal renewal; “sacred prostitution” names one (contested, but historically influential) way older scholars described formalized sexual offerings to, or in honor of, the goddess Frazer, Kramer 1969.
- Case textures: Inanna–Ishtar (Sumer/Akkad), Aphrodite (Corinth/Cyprus), Atargatis (Hierapolis), Cybele (Phrygia/Rome), with gendered liminality (e.g., Galli), votive hair/earnings, and erotic hymnody Lucian, Firmicus Maternus, Catullus 63.
- Read as a phenomenology: the Great Mother is the matrix of life–death–return; ritual sex marks the threshold where humans “pay” the cosmos in kind so that fields, wombs, and polities flourish Neumann 1955.
“The first preliminary to any scientific understanding of Greek religion is a minute examination of its ritual.”
— Jane Ellen Harrison, Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion (1903), p. vii. open‑access
Framing: the Great Mother as a ritual grammar of fecundity#
Older scholarship (Bachofen → Frazer → Harrison → Neumann → Gimbutas) treats “the Great Mother” as a structural role: primordial earth/sea womb, sovereign over growth, binding, release, and the terrible power of renewal. Hence her cult is expected to feature erotic energy as a rite of alignment—with fields, with kingship, with the underworld’s seasonal gates Bachofen 1861, Frazer 1907/1911, Neumann 1955, Gimbutas 1989.
Two canonical ritual forms bind the theme:
- Hieros gamos (sacred marriage): the goddess consorts with the king/herdsman—mythically Inanna with Dumuzi—imparting fertility and legitimation. The corpus is frankly erotic: “Make your milk sweet and thick, my bridegroom…,” sings Inanna to Dumuzi (ETCSL 4.08 love songs) ETCSL catalogue.
- Consecrated offerings of the body: dedications of hair, earnings, or sexuality in the goddess’s precinct, read by many earlier writers as institutionalized sacred prostitution—situated most famously at Babylon, Corinth, and Syrian Hierapolis Herodotus 1.199, Strabo 8.6.20, Lucian.
This is the connection older writers make: the Great Mother is the sovereign of generation; her rituals harness eros as cosmic currency.
Four nodes where the thread is clearest
1) Inanna–Ishtar (Sumer/Akkad): sacred marriage as royal technology#
Inanna’s love‑songs and cult songs present the erotic union as statecraft and agricultural blessing (New Year/harvest frames). The hymnic voice is unabashedly sensual:
“He has sprouted; he has burgeoned; he is lettuce planted by the water.” — Inanna sings of Dumuzi (ETCSL 4.08 passim) ETCSL index.
Samuel Noah Kramer’s classic compilation framed this as an enacted rite of renewal (a royal hierogamy), stitching myth to ritual economy Kramer, The Sacred Marriage Rite (1969).
Connection point. For older syntheses, the Mother’s fecundity is ritually sexualized at the apex of power; the priestess/queen mediates the land’s fertility through the king—a template later mapped (sometimes aggressively) onto Near Eastern and Mediterranean cults.
2) Aphrodite (Corinth/Cyprus): consecrated personnel and votive earnings#
Strabo’s famous notice:
“The sanctuary of Aphrodite was so rich that it owned more than a thousand hierodouloi, courtesans, whom men and women had dedicated to the goddess.” — Geography 8.6.20 (Loeb trans.) text.
At Cyprus and other Aphrodite centers, older handbooks collected references to pre‑marital offerings and dedications by courtesans; the interpretive move was to see a spectrum from votive sex to regularized sacred service tied to the goddess of love Frazer, Adonis–Attis–Osiris, Farnell, The Cults of the Greek States, vol. 2 (1896).
Connection point. The Great Mother under her Hellenic mask (Aphrodite) receives bodies and earnings as offerings; eros becomes temple income and public piety.
3) Atargatis (Hierapolis/Bambyce): chthonic waters, vows, gendered extremity#
Lucian’s De Dea Syria paints a lush cultic tableau: sacred lake, processions, eunuch‑priests, and vows involving hair and bodies:
“Many men too make themselves eunuchs, and women likewise cut off their hair; afterwards they carry their hair and garments to the goddess.” — De Dea Syria §§50–51 (Strong/Garstang trans., 1913) open‑access.
Older comparativists treated this Syrian Mother as a Near Eastern archetype whose rites of self‑offering shaded into sexual offerings in her precinct Robertson Smith, The Religion of the Semites (1889), Frazer.
Connection point. The goddess’s watery womb/abyss is appeased and stirred by offerings of sex, hair, blood—sacra of life‑power.
4) Cybele (Magna Mater): ecstatic sovereignty, the Galli, and the king#
Phrygian/Roman Cybele (the Mountain Mother) embodies wild fertility and royal fate. Literary witnesses dwell on the Galli, self‑castrated devotees:
“He, remembering the goddess, with sharp flint strips away his groin.” — Catullus 63.5–6 (trans. after the Loeb) text.
Early anthropologists read Attis–Cybele within a dying/rising and consort economy, putting sexual renunciation and sexual license inside the same Mother logic (power over generation whether through eruption or abstinence) Frazer, Firmicus, De errore prof..
Connection point. Even where abstinence dominates, the axis is still sexual power under the Mother’s sign.
A compact map: older sources that welded “Great Mother” ↔ “sacred sex”#
Cult center | Goddess (mask of the Mother) | Ritual eros motif | Consecrated personnel (older lexicon) | Representative ancient text | Older syntheses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Uruk, Umma, Nippur | Inanna/Ishtar | Hieros gamos, erotic hymnody for royal legitimation | nin-dingir, entu (high priestess) | ETCSL love songs (4.08.*) | Kramer 1969; Frazer on Near Eastern fertility rites |
Babylon | Ishtar (“Mylitta”) | One‑time sexual offering in precinct | “Every woman” once (Herodotean topos) | Herodotus 1.199 | Frazer; Robertson Smith; Harrison (comparative ritual) |
Corinth | Aphrodite | Temple‑linked courtesans, votive earnings | hierodouloi (“sacred slaves/handmaids”) | Strabo 8.6.20 | Farnell vol. 2; Frazer; Harrison |
Hierapolis (Syria) | Atargatis | Vows by hair/sex; eunuch‑priesthood; processions | Eunuchs, votaries | Lucian De Dea Syria §§50–60 | Robertson Smith; Frazer |
Phrygia → Rome | Cybele (Magna Mater) | Consort myth (Attis), ecstatic rites, renunciation | Galli (eunuch‑priests) | Catullus 63; Firmicus | Frazer; Harrison; later Neumann (archetype) |
For fuller classicist coverage: Farnell, Cults of the Greek States (1896–1909); for the Near East: Robertson Smith 1889; for psycho‑symbolics: Neumann 1955.
How the connection was argued (without scolding, just the mechanics)
1) Sympathetic fertility: “like produces like”#
Frazer systematized the magic of contact and similarity: sexual union enacted among worshipers “quickens” fields and flocks under the Mother’s eye; hence rites of seasonal license and sacred unions (Adonis/Attis cycles) Frazer, Adonis–Attis–Osiris.
“A custom … whereby women prostitute themselves once in their lives to strangers in honor of a goddess of love, appears to have been practiced in several parts of Western Asia.” — Frazer, AAO (1907), summing Herodotus/Strabo (vol. I), pp. ~67–70. scans
2) Sovereignty through eros: the king marries the land#
Harrison foregrounded ritual before myth; in her Greek frame, the Mother’s precinct is where civic order taps chthonic power. The sacred marriage—mythic or enacted—makes the polis fertile and lawful Harrison 1903.
“Ritual is primary; myth is but the spoken corollary.” — Harrison, Prolegomena, p. 329.
3) Temple economy: vows, votives, and sanctified earnings#
Aphrodite’s precincts, Atargatis’s lake, and Ishtar’s temples read—through older lenses—as nodes where earnings (including from sex) flow as votive performance; hair, coins, and bodies are consecrated to the goddess of increase Strabo 8.6.20, Lucian.
4) Gendered liminality: castration and courtesanship as access keys#
In Cybele and Atargatis, eunuch‑priesthoods dramatize that sex is under the Mother’s jurisdiction—even when renounced. In Aphrodite, eminent hetairai appear as benefactors and dedicants. Both poles—from license to asceticism—index sovereignty over generation Catullus 63, Firmicus, Farnell.
Primary voices (short, pointed)#
Herodotus (Babylon, Ishtar/Mylitta):
“Every native woman must once in her life sit in the precinct of Aphrodite and have intercourse with a stranger.” — Histories 1.199 (tr. Godley/Perseus) (text)
Strabo (Corinth, Aphrodite):
“The temple of Aphrodite was so rich that it owned more than a thousand hierodouloi, courtesans, whom men and women had dedicated to the goddess.” — Geog. 8.6.20 (Loeb) (text)
Lucian (Hierapolis, Atargatis):
“Many men too make themselves eunuchs, and women likewise cut off their hair; afterwards they carry their hair and garments to the goddess.” — De Dea Syria §§50–51 (Strong/Garstang 1913) (text)
Inanna’s love‑song (Sumer):
“My bridegroom, let me caress you! My precious caress is more savory than honey.” — ETCSL 4.08 (tr. ETCSL, representative passages) (index)
Frazer (comparativist stitch):
“The practice of women prostituting themselves in honor of a goddess of love … was not confined to a single city.” — Adonis, Attis, Osiris (1907), vol. I (paraphrased line amidst Strabo/Herodotus dossier) (scan)
Putting it together (no debunk—just the connective tissue)#
If you take older scholarship on its own terms, the Great Mother ↔ sacred prostitution linkage is a triple braid:
- Myth‑ritual isomorphism. The Mother’s union (with shepherd/king/consort) grounds life; ritual re‑performs this union in human bodies (song → procession → embrace).
- Temple mediation. Consecrated personnel (women, eunuchs, courtesans, priestesses) operate as threshold figures, converting eros into sacra (vows fulfilled, hair shorn, earnings pledged).
- Seasonal/civic payoff. The result aimed at: fertile fields, legitimate kingship, safe childbirth, city prosperity—the Mother satisfied, the cosmos oiled.
That’s the logic Bachofen–Frazer–Harrison & co. thought they were recovering. You don’t have to affirm every institutional detail to see the contour: sex (or its renunciation) appears as a cult technology of the Great Mother’s power.
FAQ#
Q1. What exactly is hieros gamos in this context?
A. A staged or textual sacred marriage between goddess and king/consort, standing in for the land’s fertility and the polity’s legitimation; Sumerian Inanna–Dumuzi songs are the archetype ETCSL, Kramer 1969.
Q2. Which texts most fueled the “sacred prostitution” idea?
A. Three classics: Herodotus 1.199 (Babylon), Strabo 8.6.20 (Corinth), and Lucian De Dea Syria (Hierapolis), amplified by Frazer and Robertson Smith into a regional pattern Herodotus, Strabo, Lucian, Robertson Smith 1889.
Q3. Where does Cybele fit if her priests are eunuchs, not courtesans?
A. In the older frame, both license and renunciation are sexual sacra: the Mother rules generation; the Galli’s self‑sacrifice dramatizes her terrible fertility power Catullus 63, Firmicus, Frazer.
Q4. What do the key terms mean (hierodoulos, qadištu/qĕdēšāh)?
A. Older philologies gloss these as consecrated women/men—often read as sacred courtesans in goddess precincts—marking status as set‑apart for ritual service and vow‑fulfillment Farnell, Robertson Smith.1
Footnotes#
Sources#
Be heavy on public‑domain and primary sources; include both ancient texts and classic works of the older synthesis.
Ancient & corpora
- Herodotus. “Histories 1.199.” Loeb/Perseus text and English translation. Perseus.
- Strabo. “Geography 8.6.20–23.” Loeb translation via LacusCurtius. University of Chicago.
- Lucian. The Syrian Goddess (De Dea Syria), trans. H. A. Strong, ed. J. Garstang. London: Constable, 1913. Internet Archive.
- Catullus. “Carmen 63 (Attis).” Latin text and English trans. Perseus.
- ETCSL (Oxford). “Inana–Dumuzi hymns and cult songs (Section 4.08).” ETCSL index.
Older scholarship & handbooks
- Frazer, James George. Adonis, Attis, Osiris: Studies in the History of Oriental Religion. London: Macmillan, 1907/1911. Archive.org scan; cf. excerpts in The Golden Bough, vol. V–VI. Gutenberg.
- Harrison, Jane Ellen. Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion. London: Black, 1903. Internet Archive.
- Robertson Smith, William. The Religion of the Semites (2nd ed.). London: A. & C. Black, 1894 [orig. 1889]. Internet Archive.
- Farnell, Lewis Richard. The Cults of the Greek States, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1896. Internet Archive.
- Kramer, Samuel Noah (ed.). The Sacred Marriage Rite: Aspects of Faith, Myth, and Ritual. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1969. Archive.org catalog.
- Bachofen, J. J. Das Mutterrecht (Mother Right). 1861; English selections. Internet Archive.
- Neumann, Erich. The Great Mother. Princeton: Bollingen/Princeton University Press, 1955. Publisher page.
- Gimbutas, Marija. The Language of the Goddess. London: Thames & Hudson, 1989. Internet Archive.
- Firmicus Maternus. De errore profanarum religionum (Teubner 1907). Internet Archive.
Later scholarship gets very granular about these lexemes; this piece keeps the older usage in view to explain the historical link those scholars proposed. ↩︎